Disagreement, Evidence, and the Doxastic Attitudes
Description
Disagreement is a pervasive feature of our intellectual lives. How should we respond to the problem of disagreement with someone whom we take to be our epistemic peer? Michele Palmira offers a framework for norms of inquiry according to which the rational response is to combine a process of double-checking with an attitude of hypothesis.
I have a question about the book:
‘The Rational Inquirer - Palmira, Michele (Ramon y Cajal Research Fellow’.
Fill in the form below.
We will respond as fast as possible.
