Disagreement, Evidence, and the Doxastic Attitudes
Description
Disagreement is a pervasive feature of our intellectual lives. How should we respond to the problem of disagreement with someone whom we take to be our epistemic peer? Michele Palmira offers a framework for norms of inquiry according to which the rational response is to combine a process of double-checking with an attitude of hypothesis.
I have a question about the book:
‘The Rational Inquirer - Palmira, Michele (Ramon y Cajal Research Fellow’.
Fill in the form below.
We will respond as fast as possible.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to measure traffic, improve Boekstra and let Google tailor ads to your interests. You can keep using the site either way — even if you decline. More info
