Aesthetic judgements that are formed on the basis of testimony are commonly held to be defective, illegitimate, or otherwise problematic. But Jon Robson argues that aesthetic testimony is in no way inferior as a source of judgement when compared to either first-hand aesthetic judgement or testimony concerning non-aesthetic matters.
I have a question about the book:
‘Aesthetic Testimony - Robson, Jon (Assistant Professor’.
Fill in the form below.
We will respond as fast as possible.
